Network Infrastructure Planning Free Essays

Electronics Laboratory Report. Free Essays

Research facility Long report. Electronic lab practice Abstract: The point of this research facility was to make us acquainted with how to utilize the various sorts of electronic gear and how to precisely utilize them to make estimations. The gear utilized in this research facility included: (I) the sign generator which was utilized to flexibly the force utilized in the different techniques, (ii) The oscilloscope which was utilized to view and record the waves created from the AC flows and afterward make significant figurings dependent on that. We will compose a custom article test on Gadgets Laboratory Report. or on the other hand any comparable subject just for you Request Now iii) The DC power flexibly was utilized in the initial two methods which included utilizing the resistors. (iv) Familiarized with the multimeter and utilized it to take estimations (v) the analysis load up which was utilized to do make the vast majority of the circuits and take the vital estimations. Strategy 1: The estimation of obstruction. The protections of the 5k? also, 22k? resistors were discovered utilizing the hypothesis and by taking the real readings. The protections of the resistors were first estimated by looking at the shading groups on the resistors to the shading code graph gave. The strategy for this is: there are four groups on every one of the resistors, and each shading on the band means a particular number on the resistor shading code diagram, which gives us the huge figure and the multiplier which is in forces of 10. The qualities utilizing the shading code were determined and seen as follows. * 5. 1k? with a  ±5% resilience * 21k? with  ±10% resistance. These ostensible qualities are the ones that are determined yet as a general rule the genuine estimations of opposition can be somewhat not the same as the ones determined because of polluting influences. The real protections are estimated by utilizing a multimeter, the manner in which this is done is that the resistors are mounted on an investigation load up and afterward the multimeter is associated directly across it. The qualities were recorded and seen as follows: * 5. 037k? * 21. 047k? | Nominal value| Actual value| 5k? resistor| 5. 1k?  ±5% tolerance| 5. 307k? | 22k? resistor| 21k?  ±10% tolerance| 21. all in all, it tends to be seen that there was a distinction in the determined ostensible estimations of the resistors and the real ones which were determined. Yet, they were still inside their resilience levels; there could be a lot of explanations behind that which may incorporate various kinds of batteries, contrasts in temperature of the room, polluting influences in various segments of the trial board which may have influenced the readings. ’ The resistance level is characterized as an admissible variety from a predefined standard. An incentive from an examination or a difference isn't viewed as huge except if it surpasses the breaking point set by as far as possible. ’ †www. bridgefieldgroup. om/bridgefieldgroup/glos9. htm For this explanation, we can expect these distinctions in the genuine estimations of the resistors to be irrelevant since they were inside the expressed resiliences. Methodology 2: The estimation of voltage. In this trial, the guideline was to make a voltage divider circuit and to complete the necessary estimations were attempted to demonstrate the rule of the voltage divider. For that, a circuit was made where a flexibly voltage was applied across two resistors R1 and R2 in arrangement as appeared in the figure beneath. What's more, the two conditions appeared beneath were utilized to make the important figurings. Picture source: http://www. ermicro. com/blog/wp-content/transfers/2008/11/basic_r01. jpg http://diy. griffshp. com/wp-content/VoltageDivider. jpg The examination was conveyed by utilizing two resistors of qualities R1 equivalent to 5k? what's more, R2 equivalent to 22k?. The resistors were mounted on the analysis board and the voltage divider circuit was made. The force was provided utilizing a +6v power gracefully and the voltages over every one of the resistors was determined utilizing the Agilent 34401 multimeter. The qualities were recorded and were seen as follows: V1=1. 1846v V2=4. 89v The aggregate of the voltages indicates be 6. 0167v which is generally about 6v ( the underlying voltage provided) which demonstrates that the voltages are inside the necessary resistance. To contrast these deliberate qualities with the ostensible qualities which can be discovered utilizing the voltage divider condition, substitute the estimations of R1 and R2 and use V as 6v to discover the voltages over each of V1 and V2. v1=6*55+22=1. 11v * V2=6*225+22=4. 88v | Nominal values| Actual values| V1| 1. 11v| 1. 1846v| V2| 4. 88v| 4. 89v| In this examination it was discovered that the genuine qualities and the ostensible vales were very little unique in relation to one another. This could have presumably been a result of the protections in the wires or free associations. Be that as it may, they were both inside a resistance level of 5% which has the effect unimportant and responsible for test blunder. The result of the investigation was that the voltages were shared between the two resistors and the bigger resistor got the bigger portion of the voltage while the littler obstruction got the indicated littler voltage going through it. This demonstrated the qualities that we discovered utilizing the ostensible figurings of the voltages. Methodology 3: current estimation. In this test, we utilize the present divider rule which is like the voltage divider condition with the exception of that the manner in which the circuit is built is it is in equal rather than arrangement. The test was set up in the strategy appeared underneath and the essential estimations were made. The circuit was developed as appeared in the schematic above and a DC voltage of +6v was gone through it, the flows were estimated in every one of the resistors and seen as: * I1(current across 5k? ) =1. 182A * I2(current across 22k? )=1. 192A (Ps: The remainder of the remainder of the report couldn't be finished since the first lab was not finished on schedule and thus the necessary data was absent. ) Table of Contents: 1. System 1 2. System 2 3. System 3 Instructions to refer to Electronics Laboratory Report., Essay models

Writing a Self Reflection Essay - Using an Outline to Organize Your Thoughts

Writing a Self Reflection Essay - Using an Outline to Organize Your ThoughtsThe problem with writing a good self reflection essay is that you may not be sure of what constitutes good writing, and that is something that you have to figure out for yourself. But with the right outline, you can find your way around the first few steps without having to get lost in the maze of theory that most people become stuck in.An outline will help you keep your entire self reflection project organized and on track. It will give you a general goal to focus on when writing each section of your essay. It will help you write the paper from start to finish in less time, which means you will spend less time thinking about whether you're going to write another one, or even knowing what to write.Writing a formal essay on a topic that you know little about can be a little nerve-racking, but if you are comfortable with the academic environment and know that you will be taking the test soon, that is the place to start. You need to have some idea of what the material you will be writing about will look like. That is the only way you will be able to do it successfully. So, if you feel a little scared, this is where an outline comes in handy.This outline will help you organize your thoughts and write about the topics that you know best. The key here is to start with what you know about the subject, which will give you a better sense of direction as you go along.Now, it is important to note that this doesn't mean that you won't write any essays. In fact, you should see this as just another tool that you can use to organize and streamline your thoughts when writing.Many people find it easier to write their own private journal instead of dealing with piles of paper to write their paper. You can take a lot of these things and adapt them to writing a self-reflection essay. It is just important to know what kind of writing you want to do, and try to stick to those steps for the next time.There ar e many different areas you can explore when you are trying to think of topics for a reflection essay. The key is to choose the topics that you enjoy, and you can then use this outline to direct you.The important thing to remember here is that you should always write your own personal journals, because if you don't it will be much harder to jot down all the thoughts that come to you during the course of your day. Taking the time to write a self-reflection essay is essential, and writing your own personal journal is the best way to start out.

5 Unforgettable Jazz Singers Who Led Big Bands

Taking a Look at Urinary Incontinence - 1837 Words

Urinary incontinence (UI) is one of the important underreported problems that leads to serious impact on physical, psychological and social well-being. According to research urinary incontinence guideline panel UI is defined as involuntary loss or leakage of urine which occurs when bladder pressure surpasses urethral pressure (Porth, 2014). With a knowingly higher incidence in females than males, this syndrome is a combination of age related changes and pathology of genitourinary system (Workman Ignatavicius, 2013). Considering the frequent prevalence of UI, it is very essential for nurses to get education and this clinical update about pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment available. Aetiology UI is mainly related with older people, affecting more elderly females than males with a ratio of 2:1 (Miller Miller, 2011). Study done by Vaughan, Goode, Burgio and Markland (2011) discovered 30 to 60 percent of women and 10-35 percent of men who are more than 65 years of age suffered from UI. Another study revealed that percentage of UI in young women is 12.8 percent in one year as compared to 46 percent between ages of 50-60 in last one month who either experienced stress or urge incontinence (Botlero, Urquhart, Davis Bell, 2008). Scemons (2013) found that nearly 43-77 percent of people living in nursing homes and community, affected by UI. It can also occurred in infants and postpartum in women. Figure 1 shows normal structure ofShow MoreRelatedTaking a Look at Urinary Incontinence1184 Words   |  5 Pagestheir urinary tract allows them the choice of whether or not to urinate (unknown, 2013). Over the course of a woman’s life she has children, ages, and finally reach es menopause. The average age when a woman becomes menopausal is 51 (unknown, 2013). Several changes happen to a woman’s body during menopause including poorer bladder and urinary control. For those women who have avoided doing Kegel exercises, are overweight, and have poor dietary and lifestyle habits, the risk for incontinence is greaterRead MorePromoting Urinary Continence After Stroke2302 Words   |  10 PagesPromoting urinary continence after stroke-a look at the importance of nurses awareness of early incontinence assessment and management. Urinary incontinence is very common following a stroke with 40-60% of hospitalised patients experiencing it in the acute phase, 25% on discharge and one third of survivors experiencing ongoing problems at one year (Barrett 2002, Kolominsky-Rabas et al.2003).Bladder and bowel problems are common following a stroke and can have a huge impact on physical and psychologicalRead MoreEffects Of Aging On Aging And Aging1343 Words   |  6 Pagesand irritable bowel syndrome that may increase the chances of constipation. The genitourinary system The bladder and urinary tract depict the epitome of various old age associated conditions. Urinary incontinence otherwise known as loss of bladder control is a common problem associated with aging. Besides old age, diabetes and other conditions also contribute to incontinence. Other common conditions include menopause for women and enlarged prostate for men. Memory Advancing age is commonlyRead MoreAging And Its Effects On The Aging1360 Words   |  6 Pagesdiabetes and irritable bowel syndrome that may increase the chances of constipation. The genitourinary system The bladder and urinary tract depict the epitome of various old age associated conditions. Urinary incontinence otherwise known as loss of bladder control is a common problem associated with aging. Besides old age, diabetes and other conditions also contribute to incontinence. Other common conditions include menopause for women and enlarged prostate for men. Memory Advancing age is commonly associatedRead MoreThe National Patient Safety Goal1601 Words   |  7 PagesNPSG 0.7.06.01 entitled â€Å" Use proven guidelines to prevent infection of the urinary tract that are caused by catheter† (The Joint Commission, 2015). It will identify reasons why this National Patient Safety Goal was chosen as well as the type of organizations that utilize urinary catheters. It will look into financial implications of implementing educational process versus the hospital cost of Catheter-Associated Urinary Infections (CAUTI). The Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) will demonstrate methodRead MoreThe National Patient Safety Goal1598 Words   |  7 PagesGoal NPSG 0.7.06.01 entitled â€Å" Use proven guidelines to prevent infection of the urinary tract that are caused by catheter† (The Joint Commission, 2015). It will identify reasons why this National Patient Safety Goal was chosen as well as the type of organizations that utilize urinary catheters. It will look into the cost of implementing an educational process compared with the hospital cost of Catheter-Associated Urinary Infections (CAUTI). The Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) will demonstrate a methodRead MoreSymptoms And Treatment Of Chronic Illness1388 Words   |  6 Pagesinventions. However, there are diseases that may not be fully cured that man has to live with the rest of their lives. The chronically ill individuals need to manage their illness properly to maintain quality of life. The purpose of this paper is to look into two case studies and to better understand on how to manage chronic illness at their respective developmental stage. Case Study 1 Omar (2010) have stated that â€Å"the prevalence of chronic illness or disability in adolescence has increased in recentRead MoreCatheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections1763 Words   |  8 Pages Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections The purpose of this paper is to identify an issue identified by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing NCLEX examination blueprint. The identified issue that I will be addressing for this paper is catheter associated urinary tract infections and is under the category of safety and infection control; according to (INSERT NCSBN CITATION) this issue falls under the overview of safe and effective care for patients. The importance of addressingRead More Urinary System Essay1825 Words   |  8 PagesUrinary System The urinary system has many different organs in order for it to work as a whole. Each organ does different functions. The urinary system consists of the two kidneys, the two ureters, the bladder, the two sphincter muscles, the nerves in the bladder, and the urethra. After your body takes what it needs from the food you eat waste products are then left behind in the blood. The urinary system works with the lungs, skin, and intestines to keep the chemicals and water in your body balancedRead MoreEssay On Caffeine1263 Words   |  6 Pagesof the consequences that come along with it? Caffeine is killing people with how high the consumption rate has gone up; â€Å"about 83% of adults drink coffee in the U.S.† (Coffee grinds US for the nation, KAren Fernau). Because of how much people are taking advantage of caffeine to get through their everyday lives, and there are consequences from it, there should be a cutback. â€Å"Ninety percent of people in the world use caffeine in one form or another. In the U.S., 80 percent of adults consume caffeine

Inductive Method free essay sample

The main criticism of the inductive method is that is not a valid means of obtaining proof. Steps of Inductive Method 1. Preparation 2. Presentation 3. Comparison amp; Abstraction 4. Generalization 5. Application Types of Inductive Teaching and Learning * Inquiry-based learning Students are presented with a challenge which will require knowledge that has not been completely covered. * Discovery learning: Students are presented with a challenge and left to work out the solution on their own. Students learn to use trial and error to analyze and resolve their findings. The instructor may provide limited feedbac * Project-based learning:Students are presented with an assignment that requires that they design or produce a deliverable. *Case-base learning: Students are presented with real-life scenarios, or cases, in which they hypothetically assume various roles. The cases tend to be very well structured filled with elaborate details to incorporate many of the variables real-life problems contain. Republic of the Philippines Naval State University Naval, Biliran Semi-detailed Lesson Plan In Science III

Effects of Discrimination Essay Example

Effects of Discrimination Paper The potential effects of discrimination Describe the potential effects of discrimination Effects include isolation, possible exclusion, situations where self-esteem and confidence can be damaged. Forms of discrimination are gender, age, disability, sexuality, race, culture, religion ,poverty, education, personal features and English Is not first language. Discrimination against any child regardless of their needs can make them feel isolated and different to other children. Very often children with special needs have a very difficult time trying to fit in with other children especially if they are in a busy school. All children can be mean to one another and not mean to. They should be helped to understand that everyone is different and how this is good. Explain to other children â€Å"we are alike but different. † There are four areas of potential for the effect discrimination has †¢ Physical- Signs of poor health may manifest. self harming, attempting suicide, cutting, etc. Bullying might become physical and other types of abuse this is more likely in older children. †¢ Emotional Emotional signs are a little more harder to see as some children put on a front to avoid having to admit they are being discriminated against, old children may exclude themselves from the group being quiet and emotionally fragile. Social lack of friends, social exclusion, older children not having no one to talk to about interests or plans for now and the future. Being treated as though someone doesnt belong left out and not involved in tasks/games. Could lead to more emotional harm, physical harm, intellectual harm, etc. †¢ Intellectual Not wanting to learn, withdrawing from places of learning, avoiding school/ missing classes . Not wanting to be around others We will write a custom essay sample on Effects of Discrimination specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Effects of Discrimination specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Effects of Discrimination specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer

The Importance of the Diary for a Study of Archbishop Laud Essays

The Importance of the Diary for a Study of Archbishop Laud Essays The Importance of the Diary for a Study of Archbishop Laud Paper The Importance of the Diary for a Study of Archbishop Laud Paper Essay Topic: History William Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury from 1633 has traditionally been seen as one of the twin pillars of Stuart despotism1, and the councillor whose influence cost Charles his crown. Though a great deal of contention has surrounded these, and other assumptions about the Archbishop in recent years, the diary, which Laud kept between the years of 1602 and 1643 has not been widely used as a source for his study. It is important to consider Laud not only as primate, but also as an individual in order to obtain the fullest possible understanding of him. As Gaunt has argued that Laud is one of those unfortunate historical figures whose biography has been penned largely from the writings of his enemies2, I feel that an attempt should be made to study Laud solely through his own writings, but in particular his diary, as it was Pynnes falsification of the text after he seized it in 1643 that led to such negative views about the Archbishop, and tainted contemporary and even later historical opinion. Through examination of the diary, I wish to ascertain what can be discovered about Lauds aims and beliefs, his significant relationships, his fears and crucially, his character, and how all of these affected his policies and decisions. The primary source for the dissertation will be Lauds diary, with the composition chiefly focused upon perceptions raised from it, using Lauds other works, letters and charges, as well as Prynnes commentary of the diary and Clarendons account of Laud to supplement these notions. However this may mean that a large proportion of the dissertation will be theoretical as much of my argument will be based on what can be inferred from what Laud does, and even fails to record. A study of the diary is particularly important to me because I find Laud to be a fascinating character around whom much historiographical argument is centred. He was pivotal to the breakdown of the Personal Rule, and I believe it will be particularly interesting to examine events from his perspective. . Religion has been labelled a fundamental and deep-rooted cause of the English Civil war3; hence there has been much debate over the key priorities and aims of William Laud, who as Archbishop of Canterbury from 1633, played a crucial role in the formation and enforcement of religious policy during the 1630s. Historians, such as McGee, have long claimed that Lauds outlook compromised of three central features; he set himself firmly against public theological controversy and believed in the benefits of ceremony. Underlying and informing these was his deep conviction that the Reformation had deprived clergymen of authority restoration of the clerical estate to its rightful place was absolutely necessary4. As evidence exists within the diary which supports this argument, each of these directives will be considered in turn through an examination of the text, in an attempt to determine the strength of Lauds ecclesiastical aims, and ascertain if there was, as McGee claims, a key priority within these. It is manifest that Laud believed the prevention of theological debate was imperative if order and stability were to be brought to the Church of England; an objective which led him to pursue a fierce campaign against radical opinion, focused particularly on Puritans. By rejecting the common forms of worships, Laud thought that they segregated themselves from the community and encouraged religious controversy, and were thus acting as a fifth column within the church; these are dangerous men, they are a scattered company5. Preaching, to Puritans the essential task of the ministry, was to Laud one such dangerous source of contention in need of regulation, a mindset which is palpable throughout the diary, for example 1625, he writes of the schedule he compiled at the Duke of Buckinghams request, in which the names of many Churchmen were marked with the letters O. and P. 6, in order that the King should be advised when appointing clerics as to which were Orthodox, and which were Puritan, and therefore suitable and unsuitable respectively. Aware that the Puritan laity were able to increase their influence over religion by financing lecturers from impropriated titles; lecturers who were often chosen to reflect their patrons preferment rather than uphold the articles of the church, Laud resolved to overthrow the feoffment, dangerous to both Church and State, an irrefutably strong intention given that he ranked it second in the extensive list of Things which I have projected to if God bless me in them7,written at the back of his diary. True to Lauds suspicions, in 1632 Attorney General William Noy uncovered that many lecturers paid for by the feoffees for impropriations, the City organisation involved with the buying up of church tithes and patronages, remained accountable to them, leading to allegations that the feoffees were an illegal corporation which was attempting to create a church within a church, outside the authority of the King. Noting in February 1632 his relief that the feoffees for impropriations were dissolved in the Chequer Chamber, Lauds adds that they were the main instrument for the Puritan faction to undo the Church8, which taken alongside his diary entry of 1638, the tumults in Scotland about the Service-Book offered to be brought in hath now brought that king down in danger. No question, but theres a great concurrence between them and the Puritan party in England9, conclusively demonstrates his deeply-held and unwavering belief that Puritans were engaged in organised political activity to destabilise the Caroline regime. Thus, despite the assertions of other ministers, such as Archbishop Abbott, that there is not in the Church of England, left any inconformable minister, which appeareth10, it is evident from the diary that Laud in no way shared this view, and instead set himself firmly against the danger posed by theological controversy which he believed Puritans, in particular, engendered. The diary also demonstrates the emphasis Laud placed on the prevention of predestination discussion, which by start of the Personal Rule had become a serious and explosive issue within the public and political sphere. Richard Montagus, A Gagg for the New Gospel, published in 1624, had ignited debate on the matter through his controversial Arminian assertion that the Church of England hath not taught it, doth not believe it, hath opposed it11. Though Charles and his Privy Council went to lengths to quieten controversy thereafter, Laud remained fearful that the political repercussions of the cause, book and opinions of Richard Montagu would constitute what he described as, a cloud arising and threatening the Church of England12. Attempts to control the destabilising impact of theological debate culminated in a royal proclamation in 1629 which banned discussion of predestination, as Charles and Laud believed that the way to secure orthodoxy was not to prove the true doctrine, but to silence all disputation which could lead to a re-opening of public debate. However, there has been much historical debate as to whom was truly impacted by the proclamation; Kevin Sharpe has argued that Laud himself was indifferent to the varying abstractions of predestination, as his main attachment was to uniformity of worship rather than the minutiae of theological dispute13, and thus where predestinarian debate was curbed, it was done so in an unbiased manner, a view supported by Julian Davies, who uses the Woodstock hearing of August 1631 as the foundation for his debate, asserting that it is here that Lauds theological attitude is most convincingly illustrated. At the hearing, Charles personally oversaw the case of several Oxford clerics accused of delivering Calvinist statements in direct contravention of the royal proclamation against predestination preaching. During proceedings, allegations were made that whilst these men had been silenced and punished for their beliefs, others had been freely permitted to express Arminian views, causing Charles, having ever desired that those points should be forborne on both sides indifferently, to demand of Laud the truth of the matter. Faced with Charles intervention, Laud made a solemn promise before God that he had upon all occasions required that those who preached either way should be proceeded with indifferently14. Davies and Sharpe have been content to take these words at face value, and indeed there is nothing in the diary that directly suggests Lauds subjective stance on the matter of predestination; his account of the hearing, though lengthy, is wholly factual, and nowhere does he record his own theological views or express any opinion on the issue, which lends weight to Sharpes claim that Laud did not debate doctrine because it was not of great interest to him15. David Como, on the other hand, refutes this claim and instead argues that Laud was engaged in a systematic policy to cut down Calvinist discourse, and that his assertions of impartiality at Woodstock were for the benefit of the manuscript of proceedings, which he knew would be printed and circulated, and were thus little more than a deliberate attempt to manipulate public opinion and quell rumours of unjust treatment towards anti-Laudians16. It is evident that Laud placed a huge amount of importance on the Woodstock hearing, as it is one of only eleven events that he lists in his days of observance to me at the fore of his diary, meriting a place beside incidents such as the Duke of Buckinghams death and the birth of Charles II. It must therefore be questioned why Laud should place so much significance upon Woodstock; if Como is to be believed, perhaps Laud recognised it as the key moment in which his neutrality on the issue of predestination was publicly accepted by the King and key privy councillors, despite the Arminian gloss he was in fact promoting on the articles of religion. However this is little more than an assumption as evidence on the issue is not wholly conclusive, thus the diarys vital importance lies in alerting the reader to Lauds fear of public predestinarian debate, and the importance he placed on the hearing at Woodstock in conjunction to this, though further speculation is required if the extent of significance the latter held for him is to be fully understood. Though McGees argues that Laud placed great value on the beauty of holiness, as he believed that the people would not respect the inward part of religion, the greater part, if the outward face were neglected17, extraordinarily little evidence to substantiate this can be found within the diary. Laud briefly writes of his desire to repair St. Pauls, and visits made to consecrate and view various parish churches, yet does not mention anything on the reforms implemented within them, nor his views on the controversy these changes caused, which is rather peculiar considering at his trial in 1645 he stated that for his whole career he had laboured nothing more, than the external worship of God (too much slighted in most parts of this kingdom) might be preserved18. Most divisive of these interior reforms was the charge to alter the placement of the Communion table from the centre of the church to the upper end of the chancel north and south and a rail before it or round it to keep it from annoyance19, which is usually accredited by historians as highly significant; indeed it is the only point out of thirteen in Lauds June 1635 Metropolitical Visitation Charge which is completely new. It is therefore surprising that nothing is mentioned in the diary of the November 1633 case of St. Gregorys, which held great importance because of its usage as a test case, in that Laud and Charles brought the relatively minor issue of the complaints of the St. Gregorys parishioners concerning the altar policy before the Privy Council in order to use their ruling as the national example. Davies argues that Charles was the chief enthusiast of the altar policy, because he believed that the communion table, as the seat of Gods presence in church, should be shown as much respect as his own throne, and thus its elevation was a visual and mnemonic means of impressing a greater respect for his pretensions to divine right20, and indeed if it was Charles who pushed for the reform, whilst Lauds support was only half-hearted, this could explain why nothing is recorded on the issue in his dairy. However, from records of the St. Gregorys hearing this does not seem plausible as it is Laud, not Charles, who attempted to drive the policy forwards; it is he who highlights the importance of consistency within the church and the significance of St. Gregorys close proximity to St. Pauls; when strangers come from beyond the sea and saw the table stand altar wise in St. Pauls but out at the door and saw the table stand otherwise in St. Gregorys, what a disunion would they say was in the Church of England, and he who argues the legality of the reform due to its basis in tradition, citing a ruling made under Queen Elizabeth that the communion table should be set in the chancel21. Although Charles ruled against the parishioners of St. Gregorys, his verdict in fact limited the extent of effective altar reform, as he left the decision of how the communion table should be placed to the discretion of each parish ordinary whose place and function it doth belong to give direction22, and therein lies the most probable explanation for Lauds silence; as he only achieved a half-victory at the hearing, it is plausible that he did not wish to record it due to disappointment, or perhaps anger. Nevertheless, despite this conjecture, it remains questionable that so little is mentioned of the other ceremonial and aesthetical reforms that were implemented under Laud, thus the possibility must be considered, despite the claims of multiple historians, that they were not as prominent a concern in Lauds daily life as other ecclesiastical aims. Last, and most important of Lauds key aims as argued by McGee, was that of his desire to re-establish the authority of the Church of England, an objective which stemmed from his belief that since the Reformation in the late 1530s the church had greatly diminished in power and influence. The loss of lands after the dissolution of the monasteries had led to a reduction of church income and eventual deficit of wealth, a concern of Lauds that is most clearly demonstrated in his diary entry of March 1624, in which his suggestion is recorded that, for the sake of the poorer priests, the four subsidies voted by the Clergy in Convocation should be paid by instalments. The idea was first presented by Laud to the Duke of Buckingham and Lord Durham, who strongly approved of the notion, and affirmed that, it was the best office that was done for the Church this seven years. However, when suggested to James, the proposal was met with his grave displeasure and the comment that never any Bishop attempted the like at any time, nor would any but myself have done it. That I had given the Church such a wound, in speaking to any laity to it23; a reaction which is very telling of the strength and singularity of Lauds determination if none but he would have dared propose schemes which benefited the clergy at the cost of the crown. From Lauds arguably rather impertinent response to James that I thought I had done a very good office for the Church: and so did my betters think. And I hoped, being done out of a good mind, for the support of many poor vicars who must needs sink under three subsidies in a year, my error (if it were one) was pardonable, the strength of Lauds feelings on the issue are indisputable as despite James strong negative reaction, Laud appears loath to relinquish his position on the matter, or admit his proposal as a mistake. Such devotion to the restoration of church wealth can also be seen through examination of Lauds attentions to Ireland, reports of the dearth of which had shocked him to such an extent that he avowed in his list of Things which I have projected to if God bless me in them, that he would procure King Charles to give all the impropriations, yet remaining in the crown, within the realm of Ireland, to that poor Church. 4 Lauds letters to Strafford verify that he did indeed acquaint his Majesty with this, and he likes it well25, which arguably demonstrates his particular fervency for this aim; having already experienced James severe displeasure when proposing a similar scheme which involved the loss of his own wealth in order to benefit the clergy, it is surprising that he risked a similar negative reaction from Charles, though it is possible he was more confident of his compliance with this aim.

High Performance Timer in Delphi - TStopWatch

High Performance Timer in Delphi - TStopWatch For routine desktop database applications, adding a single second to a tasks execution time rarely makes a difference to end users - but when you need to process millions of tree leaves or generate billions of unique random numbers, speed-of-execution becomes more important. Timing Out Your Code In some applications, very accurate, high-precision time measurement methods are important and luckily Delphi provides a high-performance counter to qualify  these times. Using RTLs Now  Function One option uses the Now function. Now, defined in the SysUtils unit, returns the current system date and time. A few lines of code measure elapsed time between the start and stop of some process: var   Ã‚  start, stop, elapsed : TDateTime;​ begin   Ã‚  start : Now;   Ã‚  //TimeOutThis();   Ã‚  stop : Now;   Ã‚  elapsed : stop - start; end; The Now function returns the current system date and time that is accurate up to 10 milliseconds (Windows NT and later) or 55 milliseconds (Windows 98). For very small intervals the precision of Now is sometimes not enough. Using Windows API GetTickCount For even more precise data, use the GetTickCount Windows API function. GetTickCount retrieves the number of milliseconds that have elapsed since the system was started, but the function only has the precision of 1 ms and may not always be accurate if the computer remains powered-up for long periods of time. The elapsed time is stored as a DWORD (32-bit) value. Therefore, the time will wrap around to zero if Windows is run continuously for 49.7 days. var   Ã‚  start, stop, elapsed : cardinal; begin   Ã‚  start : GetTickCount;   Ã‚  //TimeOutThis();   Ã‚  stop : GetTickCount;   Ã‚  elapsed : stop - start; //millisecondsend; GetTickCount is also limited to the accuracy of the system timer (10 / 55 ms). High Precision Timing Out Your Code If your PC supports a high-resolution performance counter, use the QueryPerformanceFrequency Windows API function to express the frequency, in counts per second. The value of the count is processor dependent. The QueryPerformanceCounter function retrieves the current value of the high-resolution performance counter. By calling this function at the beginning and end of a section of code, an application uses the counter as a high-resolution timer. The accuracy of high-resolution timers is around a few hundred nanoseconds. A nanosecond is a unit of time representing 0.000000001 seconds or 1 billionth of a second. TStopWatch: Delphi Implementation of a High-Resolution Counter With a nod to .Net naming conventions, a counter like TStopWatch offers a high-resolution Delphi solution for precise time measurements. TStopWatch measures elapsed time by counting timer ticks in the underlying timer mechanism. The IsHighResolution property indicates whether the timer is based on a high-resolution performance counter.The Start method starts measuring elapsed time.The Stop method stops measuring elapsed time.The ElapsedMilliseconds property gets the total elapsed time in milliseconds.The Elapsed property gets the total elapsed time in timer ticks. unit StopWatch;interface uses Windows, SysUtils, DateUtils;type TStopWatch class   Ã‚  private   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  fFrequency : TLargeInteger;   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  fIsRunning: boolean;   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  fIsHighResolution: boolean;   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  fStartCount, fStopCount : TLargeInteger;   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  procedure SetTickStamp(var lInt : TLargeInteger) ;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  function GetElapsedTicks: TLargeInteger;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  function GetElapsedMilliseconds: TLargeInteger;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  function GetElapsed: string;  Ã‚  public   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  constructor Create(const startOnCreate : boolean false) ;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  procedure Start;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  procedure Stop;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  property IsHighResolution : boolean read fIsHighResolution;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  property ElapsedTicks : TLargeInteger read GetElapsedTicks;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  property ElapsedMilliseconds : TLargeInteger read GetElapsedMilliseconds;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  property Elapsed : string read GetElapsed;  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  property IsRunning : b oolean read fIsRunning;  Ã‚  end;implementation constructor TStopWatch.Create(const startOnCreate : boolean false) ;begin   Ã‚  inherited Create;   Ã‚  fIsRunning : false;   Ã‚  fIsHighResolution : QueryPerformanceFrequency(fFrequency) ;   Ã‚  if NOT fIsHighResolution then fFrequency : MSecsPerSec;  Ã‚  if startOnCreate then Start;end;function TStopWatch.GetElapsedTicks: TLargeInteger;begin   Ã‚  result : fStopCount - fStartCount; end;procedure TStopWatch.SetTickStamp(var lInt : TLargeInteger) ;begin   Ã‚  if fIsHighResolution then   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  QueryPerformanceCounter(lInt)   Ã‚  else   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  lInt : MilliSecondOf(Now) ; end;function TStopWatch.GetElapsed: string;var   Ã‚  dt : TDateTime; begin   Ã‚  dt : ElapsedMilliseconds / MSecsPerSec / SecsPerDay;   Ã‚  result : Format(%d days, %s, [trunc(dt), FormatDateTime(hh:nn:ss.z, Frac(dt))]) ; end;function TStopWatch.GetElapsedMilliseconds: TLargeInteger;begin   Ã‚  result : (MSecsPerSec * (fStopCount - fStartCount)) div fFrequency; end;procedure TStopWatch.Start;begin   Ã‚  SetTickStamp(fStartCount) ;   Ã‚  fIsRunning : true; end;procedure TStopWatch.Stop;begin   Ã‚  SetTickStamp(fStopCount) ;   Ã‚  fIsRunning : false; end;end. Heres an example of usage: var   Ã‚  sw : TStopWatch;   Ã‚  elapsedMilliseconds : cardinal; begin   Ã‚  sw : TStopWatch.Create() ;   Ã‚  try   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  sw.Start;   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  //TimeOutThisFunction()   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  sw.Stop;   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  elapsedMilliseconds : sw.ElapsedMilliseconds;   Ã‚  finally   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  sw.Free;   Ã‚  end;end;

Trade unions constitute formal channels employees in different Term Paper

Trade unions constitute formal channels employees in different societies find opportunity to engage their employers - Term Paper Example 1). In America, unions possess along history that in one way or the other can be compared to America’s independence history. Since the formation of first organized union in the early years of 1830, America’s unions have had rough journey, characterized by; struggle, setbacks, falls, and sometimes resistances. For about one and half century, unions in USA have played a great role in defining America’s work environment and how people live, although this role has to be viewed both within lenses of success and failure (Shmoop Editorial Team Para. 2). History of Unions in America Unions in 1700s and early 1800s The history of America’s labor unions is extensive and complex intertwined within the early history of America (American Federation of Government Employees-AFGE Para. 1). The history is first linked to arrival of Europeans on American soil in the early 15th century where the passion for the visitors was to search for economic opportunities. On arrival on the American land, Europeans found bountiful economic opportunities that were unavailable in their home countries and in order to perfectly exploit these opportunities, requests were made to home countries to supply them with craftsmen. Responding to the call of settlers, home countries sent many craftsmen and working people to America and as settlement became more permanent, these craftsmen and working people started to form primitive unions, popularly known as guilds, where majority members were carpenters and cordwainers, cabinet makers and cobblers (American Federation of Government Employees-AFGE Para. 1). The essence of these early primitive guilds centered on restricting competition among tradesmen and establishing and ensuring work standards among craftsmen guided the activities (Chaison p.1). Early unions were victims of multiple employers’ and legal control, restrain and manipulation. One characteristic of these early organizations of unions was that, they did not live long since their goals were largely short-lived like reactions to employers’ attempts to cut wages or reduce job skills. Further, early employers did not give early unions chance to stabilize and grow as they perceived the unions to be illegal conspiracies whose main agenda was just to raise wages far beyond the rates individual workers could accept (Chaison p.2). The notion of illegality of unions became prevalent during this moment especially with the ruling of Cordwainers Conspiracy cases, a situation that saw many unions become moribund and weak. What the ruling meant for many American organizations was that, no formal organization in terms of workers could be recognized in the legal spheres and therefore all activities of agitating for workers interests became illegal. Nevertheless, even with this ruling, the industry growth in many parts of America continued to be witnessed and this led to emergence of numerous challenges and problems for workers. The Period from 1 830-1870s The period saw America experience great transformation in terms of numerous reforms in both governance and industry organization. Working conditions in majority of industries was poor and wages were way below employee size of work. Legal battles began between employers and some informal unions, which despite the Conspiracy

The role of media. Is there a significant difference between America Research Paper

The role of media. Is there a significant difference between America media portrayal of the world, and that of Canada What are - Research Paper Example Moreover, the spectators are placed to react negatively to the American soft gun laws which have necessarily lead to many deaths. The audience is intentionally led by Michael Moore by a deeply informative and emotional journey, distinctly spotlighting the frightening fact, that the gun culture in United States is grounded upon racism and feari. The documentary can be said to have covered variety of factors that have contributed to increased deaths within the United States due to gun violence. By making use of film techniques like juxtaposition, montage and satire, in an outstandingly powerful way, the viewers are invited by Moore to respond on the attitudes and values about human depravity and frailty as well as to inquire if the guns laws in the United States need more alterations. Moore talks about the views of different countries on violent history, poverty as well as on the breakup of the families. In the United States, the news programs telecasted on the television attempt to en grain terror into the hearts of the individuals. The news concentrate on death and violence, as mentioned by a news reporter who mentioned that he would prefer to cover a gun shooting incident before moving towards a drowning child. However, in the Canada, the news is more focused toward the incidents taking place within towns. The Canadian reporters don’t attempt to instill fear within the hearts and minds of their viewersii. The residents of United States charge for the violence faced by the country on their violent past quoting the examples of Indians and the Cowboys. However the other nations that have less violence in these days have gone through a much more violent past as experienced by the American citizens. For instance around a million people were exterminated by the Germans, The occupation of China by the Japanese, The Massacre in Algiers by France and the British butchery in the Subcontinent. The violent attitude of the American nation has been pasteurized by Moor e in a way that provides both moods of sorrowfulness as well as hilarious and hence could be referred as a two-hour anecdoteiii. The American residents reside in a country where millions of handguns are available to general public. But the acquirement of these handguns by citizens is not the issue covered in the documentary instead the most often incidents of intended shooting incidents is the main problem highlighted in the movie. Moore's considerateness doesn't suppress the stunning set-pieces that have been devised to describe his main concern. Among various explanations provided by Michael Moore in the documentary for the increased deaths due to gun violence within the United States is the culture developed within the United States of intolerance. This intolerance and increased fear has been instilled within the hearts and minds of general public through the television media that focuses more on violence. The American nation has thus become more afraid, more chaotic and more upt ight than the other nations of the world. These incidents of deaths due to gun violence in the United States result from the circumstances of chaos, fear and mere stupidity. Amongst the developed nations, no other country experiences such an increased rate of deaths due to gun violence as are experienced by the United States on annual basis although the number of guns is similar in

The Cold War and Reagan Essays -- Essays Papers

The Cold War and Reagan Topics What was the cold war? What were the causes? The Cold War at Home. -The U.S. involvement. What major roles did President Reagan serve in the cold war? A cold war is defined as "a conflict between nations for national advantage conducted by political, economic, and psychological means instead of direct military action." The Cold War defined by the same source was determined to be "the contest for power between the communist nations headed by the Soviet Union and the nations of the West headed by the United States that began after World War II"(Barnhart & Thorndike, 198). Causes of the Cold War included the struggle between conflicting values, those of Democracy in the West and statism in the East. After WWII the re-establishment of Eastern European countries destroyed in the war led to much disagreement about governmental structures, the West wanted Democracies with capitalist systems while the East (USSR) wanted a communist regime. The USSR would then be able to use the countries as buffer states against any further attack. This attack on the Soviets that might come would not take long to go through the buffer states protecting them against the new mechanism of war. World War II had created fear in the Soviets, mainly because of the use of the Atomic Bomb, and therefore they pushed towards nuclear technology. The label "iron curtain" was placed on the barrier existing between the Soviet bloc and the rest of the world, this idea was pushed by Winston Churchill to further British power in Western Europe. Forty-six years of a blind war followed and the West and the East fought "a war of nerves." As soon as World War II had ended threats of war with the Soviet Union beg... ...The Cold War was fought through the build up of arms, technology, and psychologically on the home front with a battle of nerves. Works Cited Internet Sources - http://ac.acusd.edu/History/20th/coldwar8.html - http://ac.acusd.edu/History/20th/reagan.html - http://icdweb.cc.purdue.edu/~phealy/foreign.html - http://icdweb.cc.purdue.edu/~phealy/mccarthy.html - http://icdweb.cc.purdue.edu/~phealy/yalta.html - http://www.tntech.edu/~mww/www/reagan.html - http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/glimpse/presidents/html/rr40.html - Barnhart, Clarence L., Thorndike E.L., Thorndike Barnhart Advanced Dictionary, Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company, 1974. - Cannon, Lou. President Reagan: the Role of a Lifetime. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1991. - Wills, Gary. Reagan’s America. New York, Viking Penguin, 1988.

Richard Brandt

Richard Brandt: Rule Utilitarianism Chapter two in our book Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment covers different philosopher’s views on Rule Utilitarianism and how it is applied to misconduct and unlawful acts. In Richard Brandt’s discussion he raises three questions that should be addressed when identifying our American system of punishment. What is justifiable punishment for a criminals past actions? What are good principles of punishment? What defenses should be used as good excuses to keep someone from being punished? Our actions should be guided by a set of prescriptions the conscientious following of which by all would have maximum net expectable utility† (Brandt, 1972). In Utilitarianism they choose the set of rules or practices that would produce the greatest net expectable utility if everyone followed them.Net Expectable Utility is a more positive outcome for a higher percentage of the population. Brandt believes our system of punishment is based on three assumptions: (1) Fear of punishment deters criminal behavior. (2) Imprisonment or fines make repeat offenders less likely. 3) Imprisonment stops the criminal from harming society while that person is in prison or incarcerated. â€Å"Punishment is itself an evil, and hence should be avoided where this is consistent with the public good. Punishment should have precisely such a degree of severity that the probable disutility of greater severity just balances the probable gain in utility (less crime because of more serious threat)†(p. 94). I have to agree with Brandt on this view because if the punishment does not fit the crime, criminal behavior is sure to be more prevalent.I’m a firm believer in scaring the malicious minds into acting lawfully and abiding by the law in order to keep the majority of the public safe. Brandt says that the cost should be counted along with the value of what is bought. This means to me that the punishment HAS to equal, if not be greater , then the crime. He also says that many criminals will go undetected and because of that some penalties will have to be so severe that the risks outweigh the gain in whatever the crime might be.Another agreeable point Brandt makes is that the more serious crimes should carry the heavier penalties not just for prevention of the crime but also to motivate the criminals to commit a less serious rather then a more serious crime. To make sure that the same punishment be inflicted on any social status, and that the same suffering is felt from the crime, Brandt says that heavier fines would be given to a richer man then to a poorer man. If a rich man were to receive the same fine as a poor man it may barely give him any suffering at all.While if a poor man met the same penalty financially as a rich man he may remain in debt for the remainder of his life. Brandt then begins to speak Jeremy Bentham and of such â€Å"excuses† that would not make a person criminally liable for a crime. He first mentions that a man who committed a crime that was not yet a law cannot later be punished for it. I have to agree here because you aren’t breaking the law if it isn’t one yet. I also, however, believe that if that prior â€Å"non-law† is severe enough and the evidence is still applicable in court then the person can be tried and found guilty after the fact.His second excuse is that the law had not yet been made public. In order for the public to know they are performing a unlawful act they must first know that what they are doing is against the law and can result in punishment and fines. The third excuse is that if the offender was an infant, insane or intoxicated they should also be excused of the crime. I think that underage and insane offenders may have a legitimate excuse, and the same may go for the intoxicated but in order for the intoxicated to be excused from punishment, it must not be voluntary intoxication.Bentham then says the offender can b e excused if they were ignorant of the possible consequences and thought they were acting in a lawful way. I don’t agree with this view because it is the citizens responsibility to know that he or she is acting unlawfully and what the consequences of their actions may be. â€Å"I didn’t know I couldn’t do that† is something police officers hear all the time and if they let everyone who said that to them go free they’d probably be out of a job. Bentham’s final excuse is â€Å"that the motivation to commit the offense was so strong that no threat of law could prevent the crime† (Brandt, 1972).I believe that some offenders get angry enough to ignore the consequences of the crime they about to commit but this is still not excuse for breaking the law and the law should still be applied to these people. How would a judge be able to determine if someone was acting maliciously or out of pure emotion? Richard Brandt states that Bentham’ s legal defenses need some amending. He says that not punishing in certain cases will reduce the amount of suffering brought to the public by the law and that by not punishing in all of these cases will cause a â€Å"negligible increase in the incidence of crime† (Brandt, 1972).Brandt says that the utilitarian is committed to defend the concept of â€Å"strict liability† in order to get a strong deterrent effect when everyone knows that all behavior of a certain sort would be punished. When speaking of impulsive actions that lead to criminal actions Brandt says that people who commit impulsive crimes in the heat of anger don’t think about the consequences of their action and therefore would not be deterred by a stricter law.He also says that these people are unlikely to repeat the crime so that a smaller sentence should be given to them in order to save a good man for society. I like this idea but I find it hard to agree with completely. Who is to say which crim es are impulsive and which crimes are premeditated? Of course, some circumstances make it obvious which are impulsive for example, a man saving a small child or woman from a kidnapper and killing them in the process, but many crimes can be called impulsive and therefore let a man who isn’t telling the truth receive a lesser punishment for his crime.Richard Brandt says that some say utilitarianism needs to view imprisonment for crime in the same light as quarantining and individual. He uses the example of someone being quarantined after being diagnosed with leprosy. They are taken away from public for the greater good of the public in order to not spread disease. We cannot treat criminals the same however. Criminals need to be shown punishment for their crime so going to prison cannot be made comfortable to them.It has to be a time of sorrow and pity so that it both fears prospective criminals and prevents criminals from becoming repeat offenders. Most criminals will be allowe d back into society after severing their time, lepers will never see society again. â€Å"There is a difference between the kind of treatment justified on utilitarian grounds for a person who may have to make a sacrifice for the public welfare through no fault of his own, and for a person who is required to make a sacrifice because he has selfishly and deliberately trampled on the rights of others, in clear view f the fact that if he is apprehended society must make an example of him† (Brandt, 1972) My favorite part of this section is when Richard Brandt compared the utilitarian view of punishment to that of a parent with a child. A parent lets the child know of the rules, about how to be safe, and about right and wrong. The child must know of the bad act before he or she can be punished for it. A parent will give a more severe punishment to their child according to what they have done to break a rule.The parent establishes rules for the â€Å"future good of the child† (Brandt, 1972). All this is done to make life at home tolerable and to ensure that the future of the child is a bright and successful one, punishment is an essential part of every one of our lives and whether we are avoiding it or being put through punishment, it is for the greater good. WORKS CITED Brandt, Richard. (1972). Rule utilitarinism (iii). In G Ezorsky (Ed. ), Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment (pp. 93-101). Albany: State University of New York Press

What Do You Do Best College Interview Question

This question overlaps a bit with another common interview question, What will you contribute to our campus community? Here, however, the question is more pointed and perhaps more awkward. After all, you can make a wide range of contributions to a campus community. To be asked to identify just one thing that you do best is far more limiting and intimidating. As we think about a winning response, keep in mind the purpose of the question. Your college interviewer is trying to identify something that you are passionate about, something that you have devoted time and energy to mastering. The college is looking for something that sets you apart from other applicants, some skill or talent that makes you the unique person you are. Is an Academic or Non-Academic Answer Best? If asked this question, you may be tempted to use it as an opportunity to prove that you are a strong student. Im really good at math. Im fluent in Spanish. Answers such as these are fine, but they may not be your best choice. If, for example, you truly are good at math, your academic transcript, SAT scores, and AP scores already demonstrate this point. So if you answer this question by highlighting your math skills, you are telling your interviewer something that he or she already knows. The reason you have an interview to begin with is because the college has holistic admissions. The admissions folks want to evaluate you as a whole person, not as an empirical set of grades and test scores. Thus, if you answer this question with something that your transcript already presents, youve lost an opportunity to highlight a dimension of your interests and personality that cannot be gleaned from the rest of your application. Put yourself in the shoes of your interviewer. Which applicant are you most likely to remember at the end of the day?: The one who says she is good at chemistry or the one who has amazing skills making claymation movies? Will you remember the good speller  or the one who restored a 1929 Model A Ford? This is not to say that you should steer clear of academics, for the college certainly does want to enroll students who are good at math, French, and biology. But when given the opportunity, try to use your interview to highlight personal strengths that might not come across so clearly in the other parts of your application. I Dont Do Anything Really Well. What Now? First off, youre wrong. Ive been teaching for 25 years and I have yet to meet a student who isnt good at something. Sure, some students have no aptitude for math, and others cant throw a football more than two feet. You may be inept in the kitchen, and you might have a third-grade spelling ability, but you are good at something. If you dont recognize your talents, ask your friends, teachers, and parents. And if you still cant come up with something you consider yourself good at, think about these possible approaches to the question: Im an expert at failing. Read any article on the characteristics of successful people, and youll learn that they are good at failing. They take risks. They try new things. They make mistakes and hit dead ends. And heres the important part--they learn from those failures and keep trying. Successful people fail a lot.Im a good listener. This interview question might make you feel uncomfortable because it is asking you to boast about yourself. If you feel uncomfortable tooting your own horn, is that because you prefer listening to speaking? If so, great. The world needs more people who listen. Embrace your listening skills.Im good at smelling the roses. Sadly, Ive met many applicants to highly selective colleges who are so driven to succeed both academically and in their extracurriculars, that theyve lived high school wearing blinders. Are you the type of person who loves to pause and appreciate the world around you? A strong student who can also treasure a beautiful sunset or a quiet s nowfall is someone who has found a healthy balance in life. Embrace this quality. Avoid the Predictable Responses Some answers to this question are perfectly safe, but they are also remarkably predictable and tired. Answers such as these are likely to make your interviewer nod in a gesture of bored approval: Im very responsible. Great, but your interviewer doesnt know you any better after that response. Your grades already show that you are responsible, and you havent given your interviewer a new and interesting dimension to your application.Im a hard worker. See above. Your transcript tells your interviewer this. Focus on something that isnt obvious from the rest of your application.Im good at writing (or biology, math, history, etc). As discussed earlier, a response like this is perfectly fine, but its a lost opportunity. Youre likely to get asked what you want to major in, so use that moment to talk about your favorite academic subject. And again, realize that your transcript shows what subject you have mastered. A Final Word If youre like me, a question like this is rather awkward. It can be uncomfortable tooting your own horn. Approached correctly, however, the question gives you a great opportunity to present a dimension of your personality that isnt obvious from your application. Try to find a response that identifies something that makes you uniquely you. Surprise your interviewer, or present a facet of your personality and interests that will differentiate you from other applicants. More Interview Articles Master These Interview QuestionsAvoid These Common Interview MistakesCollege Interview Dress for MenCollege Interview Dress for Women